Learning Hub
ISO 14001 vs ISO 14064
14001 is the management system; 14064 quantifies GHG emissions. They're complementary, not alternatives — here's how they work together.
ISO 14001 and ISO 14064 are often confused because they live under the same family of environmental standards. They serve different purposes:
- ISO 14001 is about the management system that controls environmental impact.
- ISO 14064 is about quantifying greenhouse gas emissions specifically.
You can implement both — and most companies pursuing serious climate accountability do.
What each one covers
| ISO 14001 | ISO 14064 | |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Environmental management system | GHG quantification, monitoring, reporting, verification |
| Scope | All environmental impacts: waste, water, air, soil, biodiversity, compliance | Greenhouse gas emissions only |
| What it certifies | Your system manages environmental impact systematically | Your GHG numbers are accurate and verifiable |
| Structure | PDCA cycle, 10 clauses | 3 parts (organisation, project, verification) |
| Auditor output | EMS certificate | Verification opinion on GHG inventory |
The three parts of ISO 14064
| Part | Focus | What it does |
|---|---|---|
| 14064-1 | Organisation level | Specifies requirements for designing and managing GHG inventories — the standard for corporate GHG accounting (often used alongside GHG Protocol) |
| 14064-2 | Project level | Quantifies emission reductions from specific projects (e.g. renewable energy installations, efficiency upgrades) |
| 14064-3 | Verification | Defines requirements for validating and verifying GHG assertions — used by third-party auditors |
How they complement each other
Think of it this way:
- ISO 14001 provides the management framework — governance, procedures, responsibilities, continuous improvement.
- ISO 14064 provides the measurement rigour — precise GHG quantification within that management framework.
A company might:
- Implement ISO 14001 to certify that environmental management is in place.
- Apply ISO 14064-1 to structure its GHG inventory.
- Engage an ISO 14064-3 verifier to assure the inventory.
Together, they signal both operational discipline (you manage environmental impact) and credible measurement (the numbers are audited).
When to use each
- You’re starting on environmental management: ISO 14001 first. It builds the system; the inventory comes inside it.
- You’re focused on a corporate carbon footprint: ISO 14064-1 — possibly without ISO 14001 if EMS isn’t the goal.
- You need a verified GHG inventory (e.g. for CDP, SBTi or assured disclosures): ISO 14064-3 verification.
- You need both system and measurement credibility (e.g. for CSRD assurance, EcoVadis Gold/Platinum, regulated supply chain): pursue both.
ISO 14001:2026 makes the link tighter
The 2026 revision expects auditable lifecycle data lineage — exactly what ISO 14064 provides. Companies that certify to ISO 14001 and apply ISO 14064 inventory practice have a much easier time at the 2026 audit, because the EMS already pulls from a verifiable carbon dataset.
Bottom line
These aren’t competing standards. Most companies that take climate seriously end up using both. Start with whichever gap you have today and add the other when its time comes.
Was this helpful?
What was missing or unclear? (optional)
Sent. Thank you for helping us improve.