Learning Hub

ISO 14001 vs ISO 14064

14001 is the management system; 14064 quantifies GHG emissions. They're complementary, not alternatives — here's how they work together.

Dcycle Team Dcycle Team 3 min

ISO 14001 and ISO 14064 are often confused because they live under the same family of environmental standards. They serve different purposes:

  • ISO 14001 is about the management system that controls environmental impact.
  • ISO 14064 is about quantifying greenhouse gas emissions specifically.

You can implement both — and most companies pursuing serious climate accountability do.

What each one covers

ISO 14001ISO 14064
PurposeEnvironmental management systemGHG quantification, monitoring, reporting, verification
ScopeAll environmental impacts: waste, water, air, soil, biodiversity, complianceGreenhouse gas emissions only
What it certifiesYour system manages environmental impact systematicallyYour GHG numbers are accurate and verifiable
StructurePDCA cycle, 10 clauses3 parts (organisation, project, verification)
Auditor outputEMS certificateVerification opinion on GHG inventory

The three parts of ISO 14064

PartFocusWhat it does
14064-1Organisation levelSpecifies requirements for designing and managing GHG inventories — the standard for corporate GHG accounting (often used alongside GHG Protocol)
14064-2Project levelQuantifies emission reductions from specific projects (e.g. renewable energy installations, efficiency upgrades)
14064-3VerificationDefines requirements for validating and verifying GHG assertions — used by third-party auditors

How they complement each other

Think of it this way:

  • ISO 14001 provides the management framework — governance, procedures, responsibilities, continuous improvement.
  • ISO 14064 provides the measurement rigour — precise GHG quantification within that management framework.

A company might:

  1. Implement ISO 14001 to certify that environmental management is in place.
  2. Apply ISO 14064-1 to structure its GHG inventory.
  3. Engage an ISO 14064-3 verifier to assure the inventory.

Together, they signal both operational discipline (you manage environmental impact) and credible measurement (the numbers are audited).

When to use each

  • You’re starting on environmental management: ISO 14001 first. It builds the system; the inventory comes inside it.
  • You’re focused on a corporate carbon footprint: ISO 14064-1 — possibly without ISO 14001 if EMS isn’t the goal.
  • You need a verified GHG inventory (e.g. for CDP, SBTi or assured disclosures): ISO 14064-3 verification.
  • You need both system and measurement credibility (e.g. for CSRD assurance, EcoVadis Gold/Platinum, regulated supply chain): pursue both.

The 2026 revision expects auditable lifecycle data lineage — exactly what ISO 14064 provides. Companies that certify to ISO 14001 and apply ISO 14064 inventory practice have a much easier time at the 2026 audit, because the EMS already pulls from a verifiable carbon dataset.

Bottom line

These aren’t competing standards. Most companies that take climate seriously end up using both. Start with whichever gap you have today and add the other when its time comes.


Was this helpful?