Learning Hub

CSRD timeline 2026: what to do each quarter

Quarter-by-quarter playbook for companies reporting under CSRD in 2026 — what to finish in Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4 to hit your filing deadline.

Dcycle Team Dcycle Team 4 min

If you’re reporting on FY 2025 data in 2026 — typical wave 2 cadence — the work spans the whole year. Here’s the rhythm that consistently lands a clean report in time.

Q1 — Double materiality assessment

Finish your DMA in the first quarter. Everything downstream depends on it:

  • Lock the stakeholder engagement plan.
  • Score all ESRS topics on impact and financial materiality.
  • Set thresholds and select material topics.
  • Get board / audit committee sign-off on the final list.

Why early: the DMA defines what data you need to collect. Starting data collection without it means you’ll collect data you don’t need and miss data you do.

Q1–Q2 — Data collection

In parallel with Q1, kick off data collection for the topics you already know will be material:

  • Run a gap analysis: 320 data points vs what exists in your systems today.
  • Prioritise high-materiality topics first.
  • Engage value chain suppliers (respecting the PSME cap for those under 1,000 employees).
  • Stand up the data infrastructure — single source of truth, audit trails, version control.

Plan for 6+ weeks here, often longer. Supplier data is the most common bottleneck.

Q2–Q3 — Drafting

Start writing once the DMA is locked and the first wave of data is in:

  • Structure the report around ESRS 2 (general disclosures) + the topical standards (E1–E5, S1–S4, G1) for material topics only.
  • Pull baselines and trend data for all quantitative metrics.
  • Begin XBRL tagging preparation in parallel (it doesn’t have to be perfect at this stage, but the data structure has to support it).
  • Cross-reference qualitative disclosures with policies, governance documents and minutes — each claim needs a source.

Q3 — Internal review

Before the auditor sees it:

  • QA every data point: source, calculation, version, sign-off.
  • Verify the audit trail is complete and reproducible.
  • Pre-brief your assurance provider on scope and methodology so the formal review goes faster.
  • Address obvious gaps now — Q4 is too late.

Q4 — Assurance and submission

Final stretch:

  • External auditors run their limited assurance review.
  • Resolve findings and produce the final version.
  • Convert to XBRL format and validate against the EFRAG taxonomy.
  • File with the national registry as part of the management report.

Common timing mistakes

  • Starting data collection before the DMA is done. You waste effort on non-material topics.
  • Treating XBRL as a last-minute conversion job. It’s a tagging exercise that’s easier if your data structure was designed for it.
  • Engaging auditors in Q4. They need to understand your methodology in Q3, not be surprised in December.
  • Trying to be perfect on day one. Start with the data you have. Improve year on year. Auditors expect progression, not perfection.

A note on Omnibus I

If you’re now out of scope due to the 2026 threshold change, you still benefit from running through Q1 and Q2 — most of the work has cross-framework value (CDP, EcoVadis, EINF, ISO 14001 all draw on the same underlying data).


Was this helpful?