Learning Hub
CSRD timeline 2026: what to do each quarter
Quarter-by-quarter playbook for companies reporting under CSRD in 2026 — what to finish in Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4 to hit your filing deadline.
If you’re reporting on FY 2025 data in 2026 — typical wave 2 cadence — the work spans the whole year. Here’s the rhythm that consistently lands a clean report in time.
Q1 — Double materiality assessment
Finish your DMA in the first quarter. Everything downstream depends on it:
- Lock the stakeholder engagement plan.
- Score all ESRS topics on impact and financial materiality.
- Set thresholds and select material topics.
- Get board / audit committee sign-off on the final list.
Why early: the DMA defines what data you need to collect. Starting data collection without it means you’ll collect data you don’t need and miss data you do.
Q1–Q2 — Data collection
In parallel with Q1, kick off data collection for the topics you already know will be material:
- Run a gap analysis: 320 data points vs what exists in your systems today.
- Prioritise high-materiality topics first.
- Engage value chain suppliers (respecting the PSME cap for those under 1,000 employees).
- Stand up the data infrastructure — single source of truth, audit trails, version control.
Plan for 6+ weeks here, often longer. Supplier data is the most common bottleneck.
Q2–Q3 — Drafting
Start writing once the DMA is locked and the first wave of data is in:
- Structure the report around ESRS 2 (general disclosures) + the topical standards (E1–E5, S1–S4, G1) for material topics only.
- Pull baselines and trend data for all quantitative metrics.
- Begin XBRL tagging preparation in parallel (it doesn’t have to be perfect at this stage, but the data structure has to support it).
- Cross-reference qualitative disclosures with policies, governance documents and minutes — each claim needs a source.
Q3 — Internal review
Before the auditor sees it:
- QA every data point: source, calculation, version, sign-off.
- Verify the audit trail is complete and reproducible.
- Pre-brief your assurance provider on scope and methodology so the formal review goes faster.
- Address obvious gaps now — Q4 is too late.
Q4 — Assurance and submission
Final stretch:
- External auditors run their limited assurance review.
- Resolve findings and produce the final version.
- Convert to XBRL format and validate against the EFRAG taxonomy.
- File with the national registry as part of the management report.
Common timing mistakes
- Starting data collection before the DMA is done. You waste effort on non-material topics.
- Treating XBRL as a last-minute conversion job. It’s a tagging exercise that’s easier if your data structure was designed for it.
- Engaging auditors in Q4. They need to understand your methodology in Q3, not be surprised in December.
- Trying to be perfect on day one. Start with the data you have. Improve year on year. Auditors expect progression, not perfection.
A note on Omnibus I
If you’re now out of scope due to the 2026 threshold change, you still benefit from running through Q1 and Q2 — most of the work has cross-framework value (CDP, EcoVadis, EINF, ISO 14001 all draw on the same underlying data).
Was this helpful?
What was missing or unclear? (optional)
Sent. Thank you for helping us improve.