Learning Hub
CDP for first-time respondents
A practical playbook for your first CDP cycle — when to decide, who to put on the team, what to file, and what a realistic first score looks like.
You received the CDP invitation email. Now what?
Step 1 — Decide whether to file
You should file if:
- A significant customer formally requested CDP via their Supply Chain program.
- An investor signalled disclosure expectations.
- You have public climate commitments (SBTi, net-zero target).
- You’re preparing for CSRD or another mandatory regime where the data overlaps.
- Sector peers are already disclosing — your absence stands out.
You can postpone only if you’re genuinely too small AND face no stakeholder pressure. Even then, monitor — requests arrive sooner than expected, and starting late kills your first score.
Once you’ve accepted, log into the platform and confirm participation.
Step 2 — Stand up the team
CDP isn’t a single-person project. Typical team:
| Role | What they do |
|---|---|
| Sustainability lead (project manager) | Owns the response end-to-end |
| Finance / controlling | Activity data (energy, fuel, water) |
| Operations / EHS | Operational emissions, water, waste |
| Procurement | Scope 3 — purchased goods, supplier data |
| Legal / Compliance | Governance evidence, risk language |
| Investor relations or executive sponsor | Board oversight, transition plan |
Step 3 — Plan the timeline
Work backward from the submission deadline (typically June/July):
- 6 months before — Confirm decision. Allocate budget. Identify gaps.
- 5 months before — Build the emissions inventory baseline.
- 3 months before — Collect governance and risk documentation.
- 1–2 months before — Draft the response in the CDP portal.
- April–June — Submit and finalise.
Six months is realistic. Three months is tight. Less than three and you’ll likely come in below your potential.
Step 4 — Pick the right questionnaire
Start with Climate Change. It’s what scorers and customers care about most. Water and Forests can come in cycles 2 and 3 if material.
Within Climate, focus on:
- Scope 1 and 2 — full inventory, primary data, documented methodology.
- Scope 3 — screen for material categories (purchased goods, business travel, employee commuting, upstream transport). You don’t need full coverage in year one.
- Governance — document existing oversight, even if informal. Name responsible executives.
- Risks — identify 2–3 substantive climate risks with financial impact ranges.
- Targets — report any quantitative reduction goals. If you don’t have any, say so honestly.
Step 5 — Submit
CDP doesn’t penalise honest gaps in year one. It penalises misrepresentation, spend-based estimates everywhere, missing governance sections, and last-minute panic submissions.
What’s a realistic first-cycle score?
A defensible first response typically lands in the C band — sometimes B- if you have strong governance documentation and Scope 3 coverage. That’s a solid starting point.
The compounding effect kicks in by years 2 and 3, as you tighten the data architecture, verify the inventory, and get SBTi validation moving.
After submission
- Read the score report carefully — it tells you exactly which questions hurt you.
- Build a year-2 improvement plan around those weak points.
- Start SBTi engagement now — it’s an 18-month process and a top driver of the A list.
Was this helpful?
What was missing or unclear? (optional)
Sent. Thank you for helping us improve.