Learning Hub
CDP Climate, Water, Forests: when to file which
CDP's three questionnaires cover different territory. Here's what each one assesses, who typically files it, and how to sequence them across years.
CDP isn’t one questionnaire — it’s three. Companies can file one, two or all of them depending on materiality and stakeholder pressure.
Climate Change
The flagship questionnaire. Covers ~80% of all CDP respondents.
Scope
- Scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG emissions (GHG Protocol).
- Climate risks and opportunities — physical, transition, value chain.
- Targets — SBTi validation, net-zero commitments, interim milestones.
- Governance — board oversight, named accountability, climate-linked compensation.
- Transition plan — capex allocation, scenario analysis.
File it if
- You have customer or investor requests.
- You operate in emissions-intensive sectors (energy, manufacturing, transport, real estate).
- You have any public climate commitment.
Water Security
Scope
- Withdrawal, consumption and discharge by source and location.
- Basin-level risk assessment.
- Water-related targets.
- Operational and supplier water management.
File it if
- You operate in water-stressed regions.
- You’re in food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, textile, mining, semiconductors, or agriculture.
- Water is materially in your value chain.
Scoring penalises companies that report only municipal supply while ignoring groundwater abstraction. Full boundary discipline matters here.
Forests
Scope
- Supply chain exposure to seven commodities historically linked to deforestation: timber, palm oil, soy, cattle products, rubber, cocoa, coffee.
- Commodity volumes by source geography.
- Deforestation-free status with chain-of-custody evidence (not just procurement claims).
- Certification coverage (FSC, RSPO, etc.).
File it if
- Your supply chain touches any of the seven commodities (even indirectly via ingredients or packaging).
- You’re subject to EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) compliance.
How to sequence them
A phased approach is sustainable; trying to file all three on day one usually means none of them is good.
Year 1 — Climate
- Build the emissions inventory.
- Document governance.
- Identify the top 2–3 climate risks.
- File Climate Change.
Year 2 — Add Water (if material)
- Stand up water data infrastructure if water is in your impact pathway.
- File Water Security alongside Climate.
Year 3 — Add Forests (if material)
- Build commodity traceability if your supply chain has forest exposure.
- File Forests alongside the others.
Cross-questionnaire economies
Suppliers, governance, board oversight, scenario analysis — these populate all three questionnaires. A single supplier engagement program feeds Climate (Scope 3), Water (supplier water risk) and Forests (commodity traceability). Build the program once.
Overlap with regulations
- Forests ↔ EUDR (EU Deforestation Regulation): much of the same underlying data, different output formats.
- Climate ↔ CSRD E1 (Climate change): scope, targets, governance — direct overlap.
- Water ↔ CSRD E3 (Water and marine resources): direct overlap.
Build the data architecture once, file everywhere.
Was this helpful?
What was missing or unclear? (optional)
Sent. Thank you for helping us improve.