Back

Learning Hub

CDP Climate, Water, Forests: when to file which

CDP's three questionnaires cover different territory. Here's what each one assesses, who typically files it, and how to sequence them across years.

Dcycle TeamDcycle Team4 min

CDP isn’t one questionnaire — it’s three. Companies can file one, two or all of them depending on materiality and stakeholder pressure.

Climate Change

The flagship questionnaire. Covers ~80% of all CDP respondents.

Scope

  • Scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG emissions (GHG Protocol).
  • Climate risks and opportunities — physical, transition, value chain.
  • Targets — SBTi validation, net-zero commitments, interim milestones.
  • Governance — board oversight, named accountability, climate-linked compensation.
  • Transition plan — capex allocation, scenario analysis.

File it if

  • You have customer or investor requests.
  • You operate in emissions-intensive sectors (energy, manufacturing, transport, real estate).
  • You have any public climate commitment.

Water Security

Scope

  • Withdrawal, consumption and discharge by source and location.
  • Basin-level risk assessment.
  • Water-related targets.
  • Operational and supplier water management.

File it if

  • You operate in water-stressed regions.
  • You’re in food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, textile, mining, semiconductors, or agriculture.
  • Water is materially in your value chain.

Scoring penalises companies that report only municipal supply while ignoring groundwater abstraction. Full boundary discipline matters here.

Forests

Scope

  • Supply chain exposure to seven commodities historically linked to deforestation: timber, palm oil, soy, cattle products, rubber, cocoa, coffee.
  • Commodity volumes by source geography.
  • Deforestation-free status with chain-of-custody evidence (not just procurement claims).
  • Certification coverage (FSC, RSPO, etc.).

File it if

  • Your supply chain touches any of the seven commodities (even indirectly via ingredients or packaging).
  • You’re subject to EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) compliance.

How to sequence them

A phased approach is sustainable; trying to file all three on day one usually means none of them is good.

Year 1 — Climate

  • Build the emissions inventory.
  • Document governance.
  • Identify the top 2–3 climate risks.
  • File Climate Change.

Year 2 — Add Water (if material)

  • Stand up water data infrastructure if water is in your impact pathway.
  • File Water Security alongside Climate.

Year 3 — Add Forests (if material)

  • Build commodity traceability if your supply chain has forest exposure.
  • File Forests alongside the others.

Cross-questionnaire economies

Suppliers, governance, board oversight, scenario analysis — these populate all three questionnaires. A single supplier engagement program feeds Climate (Scope 3), Water (supplier water risk) and Forests (commodity traceability). Build the program once.

Overlap with regulations

  • Forests ↔ EUDR (EU Deforestation Regulation): much of the same underlying data, different output formats.
  • Climate ↔ CSRD E1 (Climate change): scope, targets, governance — direct overlap.
  • Water ↔ CSRD E3 (Water and marine resources): direct overlap.

Build the data architecture once, file everywhere.


Was this helpful?