Learning Hub
CDP Climate, Water, Forests: when to file which
CDP's three questionnaires cover different territory. Here's what each one assesses, who typically files it, and how to sequence them across years.
CDP isn’t one questionnaire — it’s three. Companies can file one, two or all of them depending on materiality and stakeholder pressure.
Climate Change
The flagship questionnaire. Covers ~80% of all CDP respondents.
Scope
- Scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG emissions (GHG Protocol).
- Climate risks and opportunities — physical, transition, value chain.
- Targets — SBTi validation, net-zero commitments, interim milestones.
- Governance — board oversight, named accountability, climate-linked compensation.
- Transition plan — capex allocation, scenario analysis.
File it if
- You have customer or investor requests.
- You operate in emissions-intensive sectors (energy, manufacturing, transport, real estate).
- You have any public climate commitment.
Water Security
Scope
- Withdrawal, consumption and discharge by source and location.
- Basin-level risk assessment.
- Water-related targets.
- Operational and supplier water management.
File it if
- You operate in water-stressed regions.
- You’re in food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, textile, mining, semiconductors, or agriculture.
- Water is materially in your value chain.
Scoring penalises companies that report only municipal supply while ignoring groundwater abstraction. Full boundary discipline matters here.
Forests
Scope
- Supply chain exposure to seven commodities historically linked to deforestation: timber, palm oil, soy, cattle products, rubber, cocoa, coffee.
- Commodity volumes by source geography.
- Deforestation-free status with chain-of-custody evidence (not just procurement claims).
- Certification coverage (FSC, RSPO, etc.).
File it if
- Your supply chain touches any of the seven commodities (even indirectly via ingredients or packaging).
- You’re subject to EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) compliance.
How to sequence them
A phased approach is sustainable; trying to file all three on day one usually means none of them is good.
Year 1 — Climate
- Build the emissions inventory.
- Document governance.
- Identify the top 2–3 climate risks.
- File Climate Change.
Year 2 — Add Water (if material)
- Stand up water data infrastructure if water is in your impact pathway.
- File Water Security alongside Climate.
Year 3 — Add Forests (if material)
- Build commodity traceability if your supply chain has forest exposure.
- File Forests alongside the others.
Cross-questionnaire economies
Suppliers, governance, board oversight, scenario analysis — these populate all three questionnaires. A single supplier engagement program feeds Climate (Scope 3), Water (supplier water risk) and Forests (commodity traceability). Build the program once.
Overlap with regulations
- Forests ↔ EUDR (EU Deforestation Regulation): much of the same underlying data, different output formats.
- Climate ↔ CSRD E1 (Climate change): scope, targets, governance — direct overlap.
- Water ↔ CSRD E3 (Water and marine resources): direct overlap.
Build the data architecture once, file everywhere.
Was this helpful?
What was missing or unclear? (optional)
Sent. Thank you for helping us improve.
Up next
What is CDP?The world's largest environmental disclosure system — what CDP is, who runs it, who uses the data, and why "voluntary" doesn't quite capture it.
Read more → CDP scoring: how to move from C to AThe 4 scoring bands explained (D / C / B / A), what each level requires, and why most companies that rush from C to A end up dropping back.
Read more →