Life Cycle Assessment
Raw materials vs. process inputs: what goes where in your LCA
The difference between a raw material that becomes part of your product and a process input that is only consumed to make it — with examples, and why the distinction changes your results.
When you model a product in an LCA, every material you enter is either a raw material or a process input. Choosing the wrong one is the most common modelling mistake — and it quietly changes your carbon result. This article explains the difference, shows examples across industries, and covers why it matters.
The core distinction
A raw material is a material that physically becomes part of the final product. A process input (also called a consumption) is a material used up while making the product, but that does not end up in it.
| Raw material | Process input (consumption) | |
|---|---|---|
| Ends up in the product? | Yes — it is part of what you ship | No — it is consumed during production |
| Where you model it | Raw material block | Inside the process, as a consumption |
| Transport included? | Yes — the material travels to your site | No transport modelled by default |
| Mental test | ”Is this in the box I hand the customer?" | "Did I use this up to make the box?” |
The single question that resolves almost every case: does this material leave the factory inside the product? If yes, it is a raw material. If it is consumed and stays behind, it is a process input.
The chair example
A wooden chair is the clearest way to see it.
- The wood, screws, and fabric become part of the chair. They are raw materials.
- If the metal frame arrives dirty and you wash it before assembly, the water and detergent used for cleaning are process inputs — they are consumed, they do not become part of the chair.
Same factory, same day, two very different roles.
Examples across industries
| Industry | Product | Raw materials (in the product) | Process inputs (consumed) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Furniture | Wooden chair | Wood, screws, foam, fabric | Cleaning water, sandpaper, glue solvent that evaporates |
| Food & beverage | Bottled juice | Fruit, sugar, water in the drink, bottle, label | Cleaning-in-place water, steam for pasteurisation, filter media |
| Automotive | Steel part | Steel coil, coating that stays on the part | Cutting fluid, press lubricant, rinse water |
| Textiles | T-shirt | Cotton yarn, dye that fixes to the fabric, thread | Process water, softeners rinsed out, energy for drying |
| Cell-cultured / biotech | Biomass | Cells and any medium retained in the final biomass | Culture media consumed by cells, cleaning reagents, buffers |
| Cosmetics | Face cream | Every ingredient in the formula, jar, cap | Sterilisation steam, tank cleaning agents |
Notice the pattern: water appears in both columns. Water that is part of the drink is a raw material; water used to clean the tank is a process input. The role — not the substance — decides the block.
Why this matters for your calculation
This is not just bookkeeping. The two choices are calculated differently.
A raw material block includes the upstream chain. When you enter a raw material, the LCA pulls in the full “cradle-to-gate” impact of producing that material and the transport of moving it to your site. A process input, by default, does not carry transport.
RAW MATERIAL (e.g. steel coil)
├── extraction of iron ore
├── steelmaking
├── rolling into coil
└── TRANSPORT to your factory ← included
PROCESS INPUT (e.g. cutting fluid)
└── production of the fluid ← included
(no transport leg modelled by default)
So if you put a real raw material in as a process input, you understate its footprint — you drop the transport of that material entirely. Over a bill of materials with many bought-in parts, that gap adds up fast.
Common mistake
Entering a bought-in component as a process input to "save time." You lose its transport impact, and it no longer shows up as part of the product's material composition.
One process or several?
If you add the same material at several stages, model it where it is actually added.
- If a chair passes through four processes and you add wood in each one, create a raw material block at each of those four processes — because each stage brings its own material (and its own transport).
- If you have 4 kg of wood and you do not know the split across stages, create one raw material block with the 4 kg. Don’t invent a breakdown you don’t have.
Raw materials are not "spent"
A useful framing: process inputs are consumed, raw materials are incorporated. You spend water cleaning a part; you don't "spend" the wood — it becomes the chair. If you catch yourself saying a material is "used up," it's probably a process input.
Why this matters for your EPD
Only if you are preparing an EPD
This section is only relevant if you are working towards an Environmental Product Declaration. If you are not, you can skip it.
An Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) is a standardised, third-party-verified report of a product’s environmental impact, following ISO 14025 and EN 15804. EPDs are built directly on your LCA model, and they are structured by life-cycle stages — the A1–A3 modules for production:
| Module | Stage | What belongs here |
|---|---|---|
| A1 | Raw material supply | Your raw materials — the cradle-to-gate impact of each |
| A2 | Transport to factory | Transport of those raw materials |
| A3 | Manufacturing | Energy and process inputs consumed during production |
The classification you choose maps straight onto these modules. Raw materials populate A1 and A2; process inputs populate A3. Get the split wrong and the EPD reports the impact in the wrong stage — which a verifier will flag, because A2 transport is expected to reflect the raw materials declared in A1.
Do this before you publish
Review your bill of materials and ask, item by item, "is this in the final product?" Everything that is becomes a raw material (A1/A2). Everything consumed during manufacturing stays as a process input (A3). This one pass prevents the most common EPD review comments.
Quick reference
- In the product → raw material block (carries upstream production + transport)
- Consumed to make it → process input (production impact only)
- Water, energy carriers, and chemicals can be either — decide by role, not by substance
- Added at multiple stages → one raw material block per stage; if the split is unknown, one block with the total
- Never downgrade a real raw material to a process input — you lose its transport
Was this helpful?
What was missing or unclear? (optional)
Sent. Thank you for helping us improve.